Windstruck state
Minnesota is a national leader in wind-power
development
By
E. M. Morison
Minnesota is “amping up” its wind watts.
The
state now has about 750 megawatts of wind energy capacity
and could add more than 2,000 megawatts of additional
capacity by 2015. Xcel Energy, Minnesota’s largest utility
and the nation’s top wind-power buyer, will nearly double
its supply of wind power in Minnesota over the next five
years, to 1,125 megawatts.
Minnesota is aiming to generate 20 percent of the state’s
electricity from renewable sources by 2015 — up from 10
percent today. At least half of that renewable power is
expected to come from wind, according to a 2005 Minnesota
Commerce Department report.
Wind
power revival
Before rural electrification began in 1935, every
Minnesota farm had a windmill to pump well water. About
1920, farmers started using windmills to power small
generator-and-battery sets, bringing electric lights and
radios to farmhouses for the first time. A Minnesota
extension service expert wrote in 1921 that “the future
possibilities of wind-driven electric plants appear to be
good.”
As power lines were extended into the Minnesota countryside
in the late 1930s and 1940s, windmills were abandoned. It
would be decades before the state again turned its attention
to “the future possibilities” of wind energy.
Interest in wind power revived in the 1990s. In 1994,
Minnesota ordered Northern States Power Co. (now Xcel
Energy) to add 425 megawatts of wind power to its portfolio
in exchange for storing spent nuclear fuel at Prairie
Island. In response, scores of wind towers went up in
Lincoln, Pipestone and Murray counties, the state’s windiest
region.
Little more than a decade later, nearly 800 wind turbines
dot the rural Minnesota landscape. They range in size from
single turbines that power individual homes, farms or
schools, to large commercial wind farms with dozens of
turbines and more than 100 megawatts of capacity. Minnesota
now ranks fourth in wind power, behind California, Texas and
Iowa, according to the American Wind Energy Association.
Wind
drivers
What’s driving this expansion?
University of Minnesota economist Douglas Tiffany, who has
written extensively on renewable energy,
says Minnesota’s wind industry has been spurred by several
factors:
With
tax breaks and other publicly-funded incentives, wind power
can be a good investment on windy sites accessible to the
transmission grid. The federal wind-production tax credit
offers 1.9 cents per kilowatt-hour for 10 years.
Minnesota offers financial incentives, too, and has invested
in wind research. Turbine design improvements are also
cutting the cost of wind power.
Renewable power mandates and goals create a market for wind
power. Minnesota requires utilities to offer consumers
renewable power. And Xcel Energy must generate 10 percent of
its power from renewables by 2015.
Backing
‘green’
In addition, consumers are demanding clean, “green” energy,
says Paul Adelmann, an Xcel Energy spokesman. The utility’s
WindSource program has 50,000 subscribers, Adelmann says,
making it “the largest voluntary consumer wind-purchasing
program in the nation.” Particularly in Minnesota, Adelmann
says, “our customers are very aware of environmental issues.
They are asking for more wind
power … and it’s having an impact.” That’s one reason why
Xcel Energy has exceeded state wind power mandates, says
Michelle Swanson, Xcel Energy policy analyst. “We recognize
that wind is an important part of our portfolio.”
The price of wind power is dropping, too. Twenty-five years
ago, when the first utility-scale turbines were installed,
wind-generated electricity cost up to 30 cents per kilowatt
hour, according to the American Wind Energy Association, a
trade group. Today’s state-of-the-art wind power plants can
generate electricity for less than 5 cents a kilowatt-hour
in many parts of the United States, according to AWEA.
That compares favorably with the cost of new coal power (4.8
to 5.5 cents per kilowatt-hour) and gas
combined cycle power (3.9 to 4.4 cents per kilowatt-hour),
the AWEA estimates. High natural gas prices are also making
wind power more competitive, Swanson says, although steel
and construction costs for wind towers are up, too, she
adds.
Benefits
and barriers
Wind turbines generate clean, renewable energy, with no
emissions and little environmental impact.
Advocates say wind power also fosters rural business
development, creates jobs, generates new property tax
revenues and offers farmers leasehold income. Still, Tiffany
says, “There are substantial economic issues, such as
investments in transmission capacity, that must be
surmounted before greater portions of total electrical
capacity can be replaced by wind.”
Wind’s chief limitation is obvious: it’s variable.
Wind-power producers can’t guarantee delivery of electricity
at scheduled times. This makes the commodity worth less to
utilities, which must supply power to retail customers on
demand.
Wind
plants can have much higher capital costs than conventional
power plants, so financing can be a hurdle, Tiffany says.
Transmission costs are also higher, because the best wind
resources are in rural
areas, distant from population centers. Getting access to
the electric grid can be a problem, too, says
Jack Keers, Rural Minnesota Energy Board chair. More
transmission lines will be needed to distribute wind power
to customers in the Twin Cities and other markets, he says.
Windy
outlook
Despite these hurdles, the outlook for Minnesota wind power
is good, Keers says. Last year, the federal
production tax credit was extended. Xcel Energy is investing
$160 million in new transmission infrastructure in southwest
Minnesota. And new wind-speed maps show that wind turbines
are feasible not only in southern Minnesota, but also in
western, northwestern and south central Minnesota.
Minnesota has made it easier for small wind power projects
to get started, too. The Community-Based Energy Development
program offers a new financing option, more flexible grid
access and other incentives for local wind-power producers,
Keers says. And Xcel Energy has agreed to buy 500 megawatts
of electricity from community-based wind energy providers.
