By E.M. Morrison
When
will cellulosic ethanol be competitive with corn ethanol?
When it can be made for about a dollar per gallon, according
to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). Or, when
corn prices climb high enough, says Doug Tiffany, a U of M
ag economist.
Figuring in credits for coproducts, the cost to convert
$50-per-ton biomass into ethanol is about $1.65 per gallon,
while converting $3-per-bushel corn into ethanol costs about
$1.59 per gallon, Tiffany says. “With higher corn prices,
cellulosic ethanol becomes more competitive,” Tiffany says.
At corn prices of $3.50 to $4.00 per bushel, plus current
incentives, cellulosic ethanol could compete using today’s
technology, he says.
Production costs will come down as cellulosic ethanol
technology improves, says AURI biofuels expert Ed Wene. In
the last five years, for example, the cost of the special
enzymes that break down cellulose has dropped by about 95
percent, and scientists expect to cut the cost even more
within a few years.
Researchers are also working to squeeze more ethanol out of
biomass. Current yields stand at less than 70 gallons of
fuel per ton of biomass. The federal energy agency hopes to
bump that up to 75 gallons per ton by 2012 and 90 gallons
per ton by 2020. These and other technical advances could
push the cost of cellulosic ethanol as low as 60 cents a
gallon within 20 years, according to the NREL.
Competitive
factors
Other factors will also affect the competitive picture for
cellulosic ethanol, Tiffany says. High oil prices make
renewables more competitive. But “if we have a period of low
energy prices, that could hold back innovations,” and
investments in improving biofuels technologies, Tiffany
says. Capital
requirements are another factor. The cost to build a
40-million-gallon corn dry mill is about $1.80 per gallon of
capacity, Tiffany says. But cellulosic ethanol plants could
cost three times that, making them less attractive to
investors and riskier to finance, compared to corn dry
mills.
Ethanol
mandates, government incentives and public policies also
enter into the competitive equation. Today’s corn ethanol
industry was spurred by federal and state policies that
created a market for ethanol, and reduced its cost to
consumers. In the coming years, Tiffany expects to see “a
very vigorous policy debate over how much government
encouragement there should be for corn ethanol.”
Meanwhile, Minnesota — the nation’s leading biofuels state —
is taking a prominent role in cellulosic ethanol’s
development. U of M scientists are tackling many of the
problems associated with biomass fuels, says Todd Reubold of
the Initiative for Renewable Energy and the Environment.
Recently, for example, U of M scientists engineered new
enzymes that can more efficiently break
down plant waste. Work is also being done on pretreatment
and fermentation technologies, feedstock collection, and
energy crop breeding and production, he says.
“Minnesota has a great history of supporting biofuels,” Wene
says. “We have more ethanol plants than other states because
our state provided incentives when no others did.” Adds
Reubold: “We’ve seen that corn ethanol plants can be very
successful. That has laid the groundwork for the next
generation of ethanol plants.”■