Liquid Gold
Tests
show syrup from ethanol production may nourish soils
By Dan Lemke
Waseca, Minn. — Minnesota may be sitting on an abundant,
low-cost, high-nutrient fertilizer that’s easy to handle and
available statewide. Better yet, it may reduce costs for
farmer’s and one of state’s fastest-growing industries.
This mystery liquid isn’t actually all that
mysterious. It’s just syrup — a soluble coproduct of
dry-mill ethanol plants. Typically the syrup is sprayed on
distiller’s grains, another ethanol coproduct, and dried for
livestock feed.
Recently AURI initiated research to evaluate the liquid
soluble as a land-applied fertilizer. “Most ethanol plants
are looking for markets for the syrup because it is has
relatively low value,” says Al Doering, who heads AURI’s
coproducts lab in Waseca, Minn. “It’s a liquid, we’re in the
middle of hog country, and farmers are used to handling
liquid manure. We made the association and decided to test
the syrup for its fertilizer value.”
Doering sent syrup samples to several independent labs and
the AURI fats and oils lab in Marshall. Tests showed
exceptionally high levels of nitrogen, potassium and
phosphate — the NPK needed to fuel high-yielding crops.
Laboratory tests show the syrup contains 24 to 29 percent
solids and is lower in pH than swine manure. Per 1,000
gallons, the syrup contains about 80 pounds of nitrogen, 89
pounds of phosphate, 63 pounds of potash (potassium), and
about 8 pounds of sulfur — all higher than swine manure.
As with manure and commercial fertilizers,
not all these nutrients are available to crops. But based on
assumed nutrient availability, 1,000 gallons of syrup, with
a $23 value, equals the same amount of commercial
fertilizer, valued at $42, at current market prices.
Using solubles for fertilizer may save
energy, as the syrup doesn’t have to be dried by the ethanol
plant. Plus, the fuel used to produce and transport
commercial fertilizers could be reduced.
“It’s worth looking at because we’re adding
value to the syrup, potentially reducing the agronomic input
costs to farmers, reducing drying time and costs for the
distiller’s grains and returning a natural product to the
soil as a fertilizer,” Doering says. “But we’re still early
on and need to look at the economics to make sure it’s
feasible … there are variables like transportation and
application costs.”
Doering says the initiative’s second phase
will likely involve university test-plot research including
yield trials, nutrient availability, plant absorption and
soil sample analysis. |